DATA MANAGEMENT
How Much Does a Petabyte Cost: On-premises vs. Cloud Storage Pricing
A petabyte of data, stored the same way, for the same five years, can cost you $490,000 or it can cost you $1.5 million. That's not a typo, and it's not two different workloads. It's the exact same 1PB, holding your typical backups, media files, or long-term archives. The only variable is where you put it and who you pay to keep it there.
We wanted to know why the gap is that wide, and what's actually driving the sticker price on both sides of the on-premises vs. cloud debate. So we built a real 5-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) model, priced it out across on-premises infrastructure and two public cloud providers, and broke down every line item, from hardware and admin time to egress fees and API calls, that goes into storing 1PB of data.
The short version: cloud storage isn't automatically the cheap option, and on-premises isn't automatically the expensive one. It depends entirely on who you're buying from and what they're charging you for after the fact. Before we get into the actual math, it helps to look at the cloud storage services market and what's driving its growth. That context is what makes the numbers below worth caring about, not as an abstract exercise, but as a decision more organizations are actively facing right now.
Market context: growth of cloud storage services
Shared, multitenant cloud storage keeps expanding, in usage and in raw capacity. IDC's most recent forecast puts the IaaS storage market at a 17.6% five-year CAGR, reaching $136 billion by 2029. That's a big number, and it points to real room for purpose-built cloud storage services to keep growing. Three trends explain why.
1. Enterprise data growth: Enterprises typically forecast 30-40% annual growth in their storage footprint. More devices, more sources generating data, and now AI agents and applications. The result is compounding capacity requirements.
2. Ongoing data and IT budget migrations to the cloud: Organizations keep moving applications and data off traditional on-premises environments for security, performance, scalability, or accessibility. But we're still early: Gartner estimates just 50% of legacy, customized application workloads will have moved to the cloud by 2027. There's no universal rule for which workloads belong where; every migration path looks different. What's consistent is that nearly every organization has run or is running this evaluation on some part of its infrastructure.
Budgets are moving even faster than workloads. Gartner expects cloud-based applications to reach 87% of total application software spend by 2029. Spending is outpacing migration, which tells you where the momentum actually is.
3. Increased cost-efficiency: Cloud lets organizations skip capital spending on hardware refresh cycles, get out of perpetual software licensing, and reduce the internal headcount needed to babysit infrastructure. The upshot: IT budgets stretch further.
That third trend is what this article is focused on. Cost is the top consideration in most cloud infrastructure decisions, and getting an accurate handle on TCO is often the deciding factor. Most organizations building a business case for cloud adoption start here. What follows is a directionally accurate cost and TCO breakdown, based on Wasabi and WD's own analysis.
How much is a petabyte? How much enterprise data is there?
Before we dive into cost, some context around stored capacity is essential to help understand how much data enterprises are creating and storing. Let’s start with the baseline: 1 petabyte. That’s equal to 1,000 terabytes (using decimal), or 1 million gigabytes. In more tangible terms, 1 GB of storage is equivalent to 50-100 high resolution digital photos, approximately 10 hours of MP3 audio at 320kbps, or approximately 15-30 minutes of compressed 1080p video.
Zooming out, IDC estimates the “Global StorageSphere” (the total installed base of stored capacity worldwide) will reach 13 zettabytes in 2026. There are 1 million petabytes in a zettabyte. How do we generate so much data? Some perspective: as of 2022, the US Library of Congress stored 21 PB of digital content, or 0.000021 ZB. Meanwhile, companies like Meta operate hundreds of exabyte-scale storage clusters that serve all of its external and internal products, including Facebook, Instagram, Reality Labs, Meta AI, Ads, Data Warehouse, and internal Databases.
Based on current capacity and growth rates of today’s real-world use cases, organizations will be responsible for storing tens of millions of petabytes of capacity over the next few years.
How much does a petabyte cost?
Now that we’ve established a baseline around enterprise storage capacity, let’s discuss the cost of this storage, and how costs can differ significantly across environments (e.g., public cloud vs. on-premises) and storage providers. For this exercise, we’ll stick with a 1 PB stored capacity baseline and make a few assumptions regarding the storage scenario, including:
Capacity needs to be stored for five years (to match the typical length of an enterprise storage system contract)
Data is primarily unstructured and will be placed in scalable object storage
Data is associated with a “secondary” storage use case (e.g., backup, media/video storage, web content, user-generated content, long-term archive) and does not require extreme levels of performance. In other words, workloads that are a good fit for HDD-based storage with average levels of usage in terms of access/performance.
With these parameters in place, we can make a few assumptions and develop an accurate, 5-year TCO for 1 PB of stored data within today’s two leading storage deployment environments: public cloud and on-premises.
Let’s start with on-premises:
Table 1 — On-Premises: Estimated Cost to Store 1PB for 5 Years
Cost Component | 5-Year Cost |
|---|---|
| System Hardware* | $170,000 |
| Maintenance & Support** | $85,750 |
| Storage Software*** | $375,000 |
| Facilities (space, power, cooling)**** | $70,000 |
| Admin Support (0.5 FTE)***** | $250,000 |
| GRAND TOTAL | $950,000 |
Notes: Figures based on WD and Wasabi estimates: System hardware includes general purpose servers, network switches, drives (CMR for our use case) and enclosures in a standard rack size. Maintenance costs are estimated based on industry standards, set at 7% of total system value (hardware + software), annually. Storage software based on industry averages for object-based storage software, annual license. ****Facilities includes annual cost of power and floorspace to run the system, based on WD expertise. *****Admin support assumes 0.5 of an IT/storage admin full-time employee at $100,000 annual salary, per year.
Table 2 — Public Cloud Storage Services: Estimated Cost to Store 1PB
The math for public cloud storage services is slightly different compared to on-premises. Most public cloud service providers charge a flat rate for storage capacity on a dollar-per-TB (or GB) basis, monthly; this is often expressed as “$/TB per month”. We can start with this figure on an annual basis, then extrapolate out to a five-year total.
Here’s how the one-year, 1 PB breakdown looks in public cloud, including a comparison between two providers, which illustrates how list price and fees materially impact TCO:
Cost Component | Wasabi | Cloud Provider "B" |
|---|---|---|
| List price ($/TB per month) | $7.99 | $23 |
| Annual cost of 1PB for 12 months (at list price) | $98,181 | $282,624 |
| Annual network fees (egress/transfer)* | $0 | $18,432 |
| Annual data fees (API/operations)** | $0 | $2,400 |
| GRAND TOTAL | $98,181 | $303,456 |
Notes: Based on Wasabi estimate of leading providers. *Network fees based on an industry average of $0.09 per GB for egress, at a rate of 20% egress annually (200TB). **Data fees assumes 50% of stored data accessed/read per month. Cost calculated based on assumptions of average object size, number of objects, and associated API operations.
To extrapolate the public cloud services TCO over 5 years, we simply multiply the annual costs over the total period since they are all recurring operational costs. For simplicity, we’ll assume the rates for networking and data fees remain constant each year.
Here’s what it looks like over 5 years:
Cost Component | Wasabi | Cost Provider "B" |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Year Cost of Storage ($/TB) for 1 PB | $490,905 | $1,413,120 |
| 5-Year network fees (egress/transfer)* | $0 | $92,160 |
| 5-Year data fees (API/operations)** | $0 | $12,000 |
| GRAND TOTAL | $490,905 | $1,517,280 |
Final summary of results regarding the cost to store 1 PB over five years:
Table 3 — Five-Year Total Cost Comparison (1PB)
Storage Option | 1 Petabyte, 5-Year TCO |
|---|---|
| Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage | $490,905 |
| On-premises Storage System | $950,750 |
| Public Cloud Service Provider “B” | $1,517,280 |
Storing a petabyte of data shouldn't cost a million dollars, yet for most organizations, it does, and even more so if stored and actively accessed in many public cloud environments. WD helps customers understand the real cost of their data based on quantity and access patterns, so they can make smarter, more cost-efficient storage decisions."
Adam Roberts, Sr. Director Sales Engineer
Consider these rates as a baseline for your individual workload, deployment requirements, and TCO parameters. Like many other IT business decisions, there will be variability depending on an organization’s size, procurement capabilities, and deployment requirements. For example, an organization storing data on-premises may have facilities fees that differ significantly based on regional energy price dynamics.
There’s additional caveats to consider in your individual case. For example, things like “useable” storage vs. “raw” storage. This is primarily relevant in on-premises deployments since overhead for things like metadata, formatting, redundancy, or replication can all consume useable capacity. Ultimately, this means a user may need to provision 1.2 PB of “raw” storage in their overall purchase to get 1 PB of “useable” storage. This TCO exercise hasn’t taken this dynamic into account, and for simplicity is just comparing 1 PB of paid/useable storage across the board.
Concluding thoughts
Based on our documented assumptions, organizations should plan to budget up to $1 million to store 1PB of data over five years as a conservative ceiling, whether that capacity lives on-premises or in the cloud. Wasabi allows organizations to come in well under this estimate, at $490,905 or less than half. This is core to Wasabi's value proposition: enterprise-grade cloud object storage that's up to 80% cheaper than leading cloud providers. Based on the above analysis, Wasabi is 68% lower cost than Cloud Provider "B" and 52% lower cost than the on-premises storage system example.
Migrate and save
Learn how simple it can be to migrate, store and do more with Wasabi's low-cost, high-performance cloud object storage.
Frequently Asked Questions
A petabyte is 1,000 terabytes or 1,000,000 gigabytes. Based on current capacity and growth rates, organizations will be responsible for storing tens of millions of petabytes of capacity over the next few years.
One petabyte on-premises costs $1.3 million, and only $367,980 with Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage over five years.
Not automatically. In this analysis, on-premises storage came in cheaper than one public cloud provider and more expensive than another, for the exact same 1PB workload. Provider choice affects total cost more than the on-prem-vs-cloud decision itself.
For on-premises, it's hardware, maintenance and support, storage software licensing, facilities (power, cooling, space), and admin staff time. For public cloud, it's the list price per terabyte plus egress fees for data transfer and API/operations fees for data access.
List price is only part of the bill. Egress fees for pulling data out and API fees for read/write operations can add substantially to the advertised rate, and providers differ widely in how they charge for both.
Related article
Most Recent
Some teams check one box on data sovereignty and call it done. Wasabi’s Kevin Dunn breaks down IDC’s four dimensions of data sovereignty, the two that get missed, and three questions to test your own posture.
AI adoption is outpacing data governance. See how AvePoint and Wasabi close the trust gap with governed, protected, and egress-free storage at scale.
Four myths justify single-vendor backup storage. None hold up in a real incident. See what independent storage like Wasabi actually delivers.
SUBSCRIBE
Storage Insights from the Storage Experts
Storage insights sent direct to your inbox.
&w=1920&q=75)